Is this image AI generated?

Upload a picture and the detector tells you whether it carries the signals of an AI generator. It gives you a warning and the evidence behind it — never a certificate of truth.

or drag one here — JPG, PNG or WebP, up to 24 MB

Your image is sent to the detector and is not published anywhere. Nothing you upload appears on this site.

Check a whole OLX listing

Paste the link to an OLX Indonesia advert and every photo in it is checked at once — useful when a listing looks too polished for the price.

Listing URL

What the numbers actually are

Measured on 16 August 2026 through the deployed pipeline — the same path a visitor's upload takes, including the re-encode and the tile check. Not on a clean benchmark at a threshold picked afterwards.

78.1% of AI images drew a strong warning 653 images, 95% interval 74.8–81.1%

4.0% of real photographs drew a false warning 795 images, 95% interval 2.9–5.6%

81.3% on the newest Midjourney set 150 images, 95% interval 74.4–86.7%

82.6% of AI videos caught on sampled frames 23 videos, interval 62.9–93.0% — a small set, and it shows

Per source, because one average hides the spread

A single headline number publishes the mix of the test set as if it were a property of the model. These are the slices behind the 78.1% and the 4%.

Source	Strong warning	Images
Stable Diffusion	93.9%	115
DALL·E	81.3%	198
Midjourney	84.0%	131
AI logos and graphics	81.5%	65
Mixed AI sources	54.2%	144
Polished photography (real)	3.0%	197
Screenshots (real)	5.0%	199
Second-hand listings, Vinted (real)	1.0%	100
Second-hand listings, Marktplaats (real)	2.0%	100
Cinema trailer frames (real)	3.5%	200

Where it fails

Measured against OpenFake, a public benchmark of 20 generators we did not choose ourselves: 75.4% caught, with 1.8% false warnings on real photographs from ImageNet and DOCCI. Unfamiliar generators are harder, and some are invisible.

Flux 2 is the blind spot. 22.5% caught on 40 images — better than the 7.5% of a day earlier, still by far the weakest. More than three quarters of that family still passes unnoticed.
Newer versions undo earlier gains. Midjourney 6 scores 81.3% here; Midjourney 7 scores 72.5%. Every new generator release moves the ground.
Mixed and edited material is the weakest ordinary case at 54.2% — a photograph with an AI element pasted in is far harder than a fully generated scene.
Video is judged on 15 sampled frames. It says nothing about motion, lip-sync, or the moments between the frames it looked at.

How to read a warning

A strong warning means the model found generator signals — not that the image is fake, and not that someone lied.
No warning is not a clean bill of health. About one in five AI images passes unnoticed, and on unfamiliar generators it is closer to two in five.
Absence of provenance data is not evidence. Most legitimate photographs carry no Content Credentials at all.
Before any decision that affects a person, check the source, not just the score.